it doesn't print it well. // // // // // void print_memories () { int a = level_error_msg; level_error_msg = 6; for ( int i=0; i

We changed error message functions: err_msg_002 -> err_msg_006. We could print it well. --- start function: array_count: start function: array_count: start function: array_count: start function: array_count: start function: array_count: st…

willinglytranslate.blogspot.com

1stWe touched files and then, we realised, we cannot save before sompilations the time when file is accurate.When we saved the file if the files were changed.So, we give up so, we giveup fighting this. 2ndIn frame works give us unchanging …

Which information you need is your understanding somthing.Now, we think, inside file was changed before operation.Hardly, we could not proof that: The proofment we need, 1. file name 2. file size of 1 3. All of File So, if we checked the a…

the below was compiled mistaken cuase of my fault. their messages in not ensured. I beleive we could compile the source code even though we don't touch it after first compiling it. https://github.com/WaitrudWeber/source_zip/blob/master/ana…

It doesn't print next Analyzer::parse: starts. // // // // // int Analyzer::parse ( char* filename ) { FILE *fp; aToken *iToken = nullptr; char *parse_token; int previous_index = 0; char dummy[256]; char* a_token; int mode_token = 0; iToke…

we could have recognised well prints of it. WM_MESSG 003: 20 *(p_evt->uMsg):20 wButtonController::Process: 20 / 15<-WM_PAINT wParam 1493243959 lParam 0 this->event->uMsg:6551900 *(this->event->uMsg)=20 Called: InvalidateRect( this->event->…

Called: InvalidateRect( this->event->hWnd, NULL, TRUE) WM_MESSG 004: 20 *(p_evt->uMsg):20 uMsg:20 p_evt->uMsg: 6551900 &uMsg: 6551900 WM_PAINT 002: 15 *(p_evt->uMsg):20 uMsg: 15 WM_MESSG 003: 15 *(p_evt->uMsg):20 wButtonController::Process…

We could print messages. Assembling the below: void err_msg_004(const char *fmt, ...); err_doit(0, 0, fmt, ap); -------------- Called: InvalidateRect( this->event->hWnd, NULL, TRUE)WM_MESSG 004: 20 *(p_evt->uMsg):20 uMsg:20 p_evt->uMsg: 65…

We could change our imagine and throw out and give up "just a way". We've already put Sleep and tried it. #include // // // // // char* err_msg_002(const char *fmt, ...) { static char* result; static va_list ap; Sleep(1000); if ( set_level…

va_start(ap, fmt); has the character 1. copying ap nside their function. We hardly use va_start inside local function from usage. However, we could use printf well. And, binary is banary in even Library.

We think the program cannot memory well first. We wonder if the program has memorization eroor or not. There is something usage in windows programming: 1. Use static as local param. 2. Use mallloc if you can. 3. Use sleep. And then, we cou…

wButtonController::Process: 20 / 15<-WM_PAINT wParam -2097082227 lParam 0 this->event->uMsg:6551900 *(this->event->uMsg)=20 Called: InvalidateRect( this->event->hWnd, NULL, TRUE) WM_MESSG 004: 20 *(p_evt->uMsg):20 uMsg:20 p_evt->uMsg: 6551…

We could say print error and compiled error. github.com I remained this as error even though I could not solve this problem.